logo_fitch_fuel

EPA Laboratory VEET Report

by admin on 28 August 2009

Evaluation of Advance Power Systems International Inc.
Fitch Fuel Catalyst

Prepared by

Vehicle and Engine Emission Testing Services
15-17 Trade Zone Drive
Ronkonkoma NY 11779

Project Description:

Advanced Power Systems International Inc. (APSI) 558 Lime Rock Rd. Lakeville, CT. 06039 manufactures the Fitch Fuel Catalyst System (FFC Device) that may be installed on either gasoline or diesel fueled engines.

The FFC Device is designed to improve energy efficiency while minimizing impact to the environment.

APSI has selected to perform the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Federal Test Procedure (FTP) CVS-75 to evaluate what benefits may be achieved by installing the FCD System on a Diesel fuel vehicle.

Tailpipe emission gases to be measured:

Hydrocarbons………..(HC)
Carbon Monoxide……(CO)
Nitric Oxide………….(NOx)
Particulate Matter ……(PM)
Carbon Dioxide………(CO2) Miles per gallon

The vehicle selected:

GMC-2500
Model year 2002
6.6 Diesel engine
Vin # F235320
No EGR, No Exhaust Catalytic Converter, No modifications to EMU software

Fuel used for this test was commercially purchased low sulfur transportation diesel on board the vehicle at the time of delivery to VEETS. Fuel specifications:
API Gravity at 60F – 36.26 Sulfur – 0.0291
Carbon Weight  -  88% Specific Heat – 18,600
Cetane Index  -  47.65

The schedule of tests performed:

Date Event
March 30, 2004 Vehicle delivered to VEETS by Fitch
March 31, 2004 One (1) Baseline Test CVS-75 Fitch Device (F750) Installed and 200 mile Accumulation
April 5, 2004 One (1) Retrofit Test-CVS-75
April 6, 2004 Vehicle placed in normal service.
June 1, 2004 Fitch Fuel Catalyst Device removed from vehicle
June 2, 2004 Vehicle placed in normal service.
July 20-21, 2004 Vehicle returns to VEETS laboratory.
Three (3) Baseline Test CVS-75
Fitch Device Installed (F750) and idled for three (3) hours
July 22-23, 2004 Three (3) Retrofit Test-CVS-75

These procedures were designed to be an A-B-A-B comparison of the impact of the Fitch Fuel Catalyst. Where A=Baseline test, and B= Retrofit test.

Prior to delivery to VEETS the vehicle had routine oil and oil filter change and OBD scan performed by a GMC dealer. The vehicle was determined to be normal operating condition.

Test Performed at VEETS:
1. CVS-75 were conducted to establish a baseline.
2. Thereafter the vehicle is fitted with the FFC (model F750) system. The vehicle was started and idled for three (3) hours to insure exposure of circulated fuel to catalyst in the In Line unit.
3. Subsequent Retrofit CVS-75 were performed.
4. The baseline and retrofit data are then compared.

Baseline Test CVS-75
Date: 3/31/04
Manufacturer: GMC Model: Duramax 2500 Diesel HD
Model Year:    2002 Vin:     F235320
Odometer:       38078 ALW: 6500 (Adjusted loaded vehicle Wt.)
Dyno Settings: Fuel: Diesel (Supplied by Fitch)
Single Roll: TRLHP-Fo-35.87
F1-2.3804
F2-0.0243
Twin Roll: Inertia Wt.:      6500lbs
IRLHP:      18.6

Test Results

Hydrocarbons
(HC)
grams/mile
Oxides of Nitrogen
(NOx)
grams/mile
Carbon Monoxide
(CO)
grams/mile
Carbon
Dioxide
(CO2)
grams/mile
Particulates
(PM)
grams/mile
Miles per Gallon
0.464 2.977 3.868 0.32 10.25

Retrofit Test-CVS-75
Date 4/5/2004
Fitch Device Installed 200 mile Accumulation
Manufacturer: GMC Model: Duramax 2500 Diesel HD
Model Year:    2002 Vin:     F235320
Odometer:       38288 ALW: 6500 (Adjusted loaded vehicle Wt.)
Dyno Settings: Fuel: Diesel (Supplied by Fitch)
Single Roll: TRLHP-Fo-35.87
F1-2.3804
F2-0.0243
Twin Roll: Inertia Wt.:      6500lbs.
IRLHP:      18.6

Test Results

Hydrocarbons
(HC)
grams/mile
Oxides of Nitrogen
(NOx)
grams/mile
Carbon Monoxide
(CO)
grams/mile
Carbon Dioxide
(CO2)
grams/mile
Particulates
(PM)
grams/mile
Miles per Gallon
0.376 3.275 2.972 0.29 12.0

Baseline Test CVS-75
Date: 7/20/04 – 7/21/04
Manufacturer: GMC Model: Duramax 2500 Diesel HD
Model Year:    2002 Vin:     F235320
Odometer:       44267 ALW: 6500 (Adjusted loaded vehicle Wt.)
Dyno Settings: Fuel: Diesel (Supplied by Fitch)
Single Roll: TRLHP-Fo-35.87
F1-2.3804
F2-0.0243
Twin Roll: Inertia Wt.:      6500lbs.
IRLHP:      18.6

Baseline Test Results CVS-75

Hydrocarbons
(HC)
grams/mile
Oxides of Nitrogen
(NOx)
grams/mile
Carbon Monoxide
(CO)
grams/mile
Carbon Dioxide
(CO2)
grams/mile
Particulates
(PM)
grams/mile
Miles/Gal.
0.089 3.595 1.812 942.428 0.376 10.761
0.068 3.647 1.562 948.771 0.316 10.695
0.086 3.972 1.715 977.795 0.414 10.375

Retrofit Test-CVS-75
7/22/04 – 7/23/04
Fitch Device Installed and idled for three (3) hours
Manufacturer: GMC Model: Duramax 2500 Diesel HD
Model Year:    2002 Vin:     F235320
Odometer:       44328 ALW: 6500 (Adjusted loaded vehicle Wt.)
Dyno Settings Fuel: Diesel (Supplied by Fitch)
Single Roll: TRLHP-Fo-35.87
F1-2.3804
F2-0.0243
Twin Roll: Inertia Wt.:      6500lbs.
IRLHP:      18.6

Retrofit Test Results CVS-75

Hydrocarbons
(HC) grams/mile

Oxides of Nitrogen
(NOx)
grams/mile
Carbon Monoxide
(CO)
grams/mile
Carbon Dioxide
(CO2)
grams/mile
Particulates
(PM)
grams/mile
Miles/Gal.
0.079 2.547 2.048 838.411 0.238 12.087
0.097 3.291 1.829 850.363 0.238 11.921
0.102 3.203 1.849 833.556 0.245 12.16


Summary of Tests

Date Event Hydrocarbons
(HC)
grams/mile
Oxides of Nitrogen
(NOx)
grams/mile
Carbon Monoxide
(CO)
grams/mile
Carbon Dioxide
(CO2)
grams/mile
Particulates
(PM)
grams/mile
Miles per Gallon
3/31/04 Baseline 1 0.464 2.977 3.868 0.32 10.25
4/5/04 Retrofit 1 0.376 3.275 2.972 0.29 12.0
6/1/04 FFC removed
7/20/04 Baseline 2-1 0.089 3.595 1.812 942.428 0.376 10.761
thru Baseline 2-2 0.068 3.647 1.562 948.771 0.316 10.695
7/21/04 Baseline 2-3 0.086 3.972 1.715 977.795 0.414 10.375
7/22/04 Retrofit 2-1 0.079 2.547 2.048 838.411 0.238 12.087
thru Retrofit 2-2 0.097 3.291 1.829 850.363 0.238 11.921
7/23/04 Retrofit 2-3 0.102 3.203 1.849 833.556 0.245 12.16
Average of Baselines 0.177 3.548 2.239 956.331 0.357 10.52
Average of Retrofits 0.164 3.079 2.175 840.777 0.253 12.056
Difference -0.013 -0.469 -0.065 -115.555 -0.104 +1.536
Percent Improvement -7.5% -13.21% -2.89% -12.08% -29.1%

+14.60%

Baseline Tests Vehicle in standard condition
Retrofit Tests Vehicle with Fitch Fuel Catalyst installed


Conclusions:

Comparison of results of the average of Baseline and Retrofit CVS-75 Fuel Economy and Emissions evaluations show statistically consistent improvement in fuel economy and emissions resulting from the installation of the Fitch Fuel Catalyst device.

{ 0 comments }

Test Results on Fuel Quality

by admin on 28 August 2009

As greater demands are put on the refineries to meet EPA standards, fuel quality continues to change with the addition of more oxygenates and other additives, the tendency of fuel to be affected by bacteria, water and oxidation is increasing. Fuel is not perfect when refined and once fuel leaves the refinery, it is subject to attack by oxygen and microorganisms such as bacteria that grow in the fuel ingesting fuel molecules and expelling non-standard molecules as by-products. With the passage of time these processes of oxygen attack and microorganism growth contribute to the increase in the concentration of non-conforming molecules that are present in small quantities when fuel leaves the refinery. These non-conforming molecules prevent engines from performing at their optimum level and can prevent fuel delivery systems from functioning.

Extensive research devoted to our area of expertise in hydrocarbon fuel reformulation bears directly on this area of concern for high fuel quality. We would like to share with you two recently completed evaluations.

Test 1. Oxidation Stability ASTM D525

Paragon Labs in Michigan performed an Oxidation Stability test (ASTM D525.4016 procedure attached). This test provides an indication of the age of fuel and the fuels ability to resist oxygen attack and formation of gums.

The attached test report. (FFC Test ASTM D525 2002) from Paragon Labs was performed on a sample of New York fuel. This sample was near the lower limits of acceptable for sale in the US (Minimum 240 minutes). Portions of this fuel were subjected to the FFC for a 24-hour soak and a seven-day soak. The results indicate that after 24 hours the fuel was improved by 57% and after seven days there was a similar finding. This indicates that the presence of the FFC not only prevents premature oxidation but it is capable of restoring fuel to a higher quality. These results are similar to those previously obtained by APSI in a 1996 report from Auto Research Labs in Illinois (FFC Test ASTM D5251996).

Test 2. Influence of the Fitch Fuel Catalyst on Bacterial Growth in Gasoline

APSI has engaged the Dept of Chemistry at the University of Connecticut to perform a series of investigations into hydrocarbon fuels. The investigation that is the subject of this report is one in that series. We are enclosing a copy of this recently concluded evaluation. The results of these studies show a significant reduction in bacterial growth in gasoline that is attributable to the introduction of the FFC into the fuel sample. Bacteria are a major cause of premature aging of fuel and one of the reasons there are so many fuel additives and cleaners on the market today.

These reports are significant and definite proof that the FFC will keep fuel fresh longer thereby reducing the tendency of fuel to form varnishes and gums, which damage fuel system components. With the integration of the Fitch Fuel Catalyst into every machine manufactured, the fuel in the machine will be of the highest possible standard and quality. The fuel insurance that the Fitch Fuel Catalyst provides guarantees there will be fewer fuel system problems and a better running engine.

Bacterial Studies on the Effect of Fitch Fuel Catalyst in Gasoline

The University of Connecticut has been engaged to perform certain investigations into hydrocarbon fuels by Advanced Power Systems International Inc of Lime Rock Ct. The investigation that is the subject of this report is one in a series funded from grants by the United States Government, Department of Defense. The DOD granted to APSI over $500,000 to investigate, 1: The viability of using the Fitch Fuel Catalyst technology as a means to reduce fuel losses by preventing premature aging of stored fuel. 2: The use of this improved fuel in reducing overall operating costs predicated on superior combustion. This report describes work done at UCONN under contract to APSI Inc. Dr. S. Suib and Dr. Claudia P. Koerting of UCONN Principal Investigators. Dr. A. Berlin head of Research and Development for APSI supervised this work. The work performed in this report was performed between November 2001 and May of 2002.

Purpose of the Investigation Rationale and Justification

In this investigation the researchers endeavored to construct an experiment that would measure the effect the presence of Fitch Fuel Catalyst (FFC) has on a bacteria known to degrade or breakdown fuels.

Bacteriology

The objective of the bacteriological studies on the FFC was to determine the antimicrobial effect of the FFC on bacterial growth in fuel. To prepare for this study a literature search was performed for bacteria that can grow using fuel, especially gasoline, as food. Both single and mixed cultures were considered for study. The factors considered in the search of an optimum bacterial strain included the following:

(i) Easy availability

(ii) Easy growing conditions

(iii) Detectable results within a short course of time, and

(iv) Biosafety level 1 (non-pathogenic)

(v) Commonly used as a model fuel-biodegrader

The literature spans over 30 years of study of microorganisms, which can consume fuel.

Conclusion

Bacteria growth in the presence of 2% gasoline increased until the addition of the FFC, day 10. Viable counts declined post FFC addition. (Figure 1, 2) It is clear that there is a suppression of growth of bacteria in the sample with the FFC present with respect to the sample where the FFC was not present.

Note: Details of this report upon request.

{ 0 comments }

VIPAC Report – Australia

by admin on 28 August 2009

Diesel Tailpipe Emissions & Fuel efficiency Test
Using The Composite Urban Omission Drive Cycle (CUEDC).

Toyota Landcruiser 80 Series Diesel

Report No. 303402-01

Vipac engineers & Scientists Ltd
Melbourne, Australia
February 2002

DOCUMENT CONTROL

REPORT No.: 303402-01

Diesel Tailpipe Emissions & Fuel Efficiency Test
Using The Composite Urban Emission Drive Cycle
(CUEDC)

FILE:
FITCH FUEL CATALYST 303402-01
PREPARED FOR:
Fitch Fuel Catalyst Australia Pty. Ltd.
New South Wales.

Contact:
Mr. Bill Sheather.

REPORT CODE:
V 06
PREPARED BY:
Vipac Engineers & Scientists Ltd.
279, Normanby Road,
Port Melbourne,
Victoria 3207.

Tel: +613 9647 9700.
Fax: +61396464370.

AUTHOR:
ROBYN DAVIES
Automotive Engineer
Date: 14th February 2002.
E-mail: robynd@vipac.com.au
REVIEWED BY:
MICHAEL SMITH
Managing Director
Date: 14th February 2002.
E-mail: michaels@vipac.com.au
REVISION HISTORY:

Revision No. Date Issued Reason/Comments
0 Initial Issue
DISTRIBUTION:

Copy No. Revision No. Location
1 0 Fitch Fuel Catalyst
2 0 Vipac Melbourne
3 0 Vipac Melbourne Library
KEYWORDS:
Diesel Tailpipe Emissions & Fuel Efficiency Test
Using The Composite Urban Emission Drive Cycle

1. INTRODUCTION

The following report details the results achieved when a Toyota Landcruiser 80 vehicle was run through a single comparative test program utilising the Composite Urban Emission Drive Cycle (CUEDC) for category NA vehicles, by Vipac Engineers and Scientists Vehicle Emission Test facility at Altona T4009.

2. PROCEDURES

The testing was carried out in accordance with the Composite Urban Emission Drive Cycle (CUEDC) drive cycle for NA class vehicles (vehicles with a GVM <4.5 tonnes). The CUEDC series of drive cycles were developed from data collected during actual driving conditions around Sydney, and take the form of a single drive-cycle (1794 seconds) broken up into four distinct phases; Congested, Residential / Minor, Arterial, Freeway / Highway. The two tests were driven by Mr. Bill Sheather (Fitch Fuel Catalyst Australia Pty. Ltd.), and were run using regular pump grade diesel fuel as agreed between Vipac Engineers and Scientists and the customer.

Calibrated Hydrocarbon (FID), Carbon Monoxide (NDIR), Carbon Dioxide (NDIR) and Oxides of Nitrogen (Chemuluminescence) gas analysers were used to determine gaseous emission levels, and a NOVA ‘Microtrol 4′ diesel particulate measurement unit was used to capture Particulate Matter.

A dilute gas sample was collected via a heated sample line to determine the gaseous emission levels of Total Hydrocarbons and Oxides of Nitrogen. Dilute samples of Carbon Monoxide and Carbon Dioxide were collected via a Constant Volume Sampler, with ambient and sample bags being analysed to determine the levels of pollutant. A partial dilution tunnel (the Microtrol 4) was used to capture the emissions of Particulate Matter, the filter papers housed within the unit being weighed prior to, and after each test to determine the mass emissions of Particulates.

The Inertia (Road Load Setting) of the dynamometer was carried out in line with the methods and criteria laid out within the directive UN/ECE R-83, (Uniform Provisions Concerning The Approval Of Vehicles With Regard To The Emission Of Pollutants According To Engine Fuel Requirements). This test is the current certification test used in Europe and Australia for light-duty diesel engine vehicles (equivalent to Australian Design Rule ADR 70/00), applicable to vehicles with a GVM <4.5 tonnes and is carried out on an inertia simulation dynamometer, replicating wind and road loads.

The first of the two tests run over the CUEDC schedule was undertaken with the vehicle in standard showroom condition. This was followed immediately by a second comparative test with the “Fitch Fuel Catalyst” installed between the fuel filter and injector pump. The results of this comparative test can be observed in tables 3.2.1 – 3.2.3 of this report.

3. RESULTS

3.1 TEST VEHICLE DETAILS

MANUFACTURER TOYOTA JAPAN
MAKE TOYOTA
MODEL LANDCRUISER 80
ODOMETER 300000 Km
BUILD DATE Not Applicable
ENGINE NO. Not Applicable
VIN NUMBER Not Applicable
ENGINE TYPE COMPRESSION IGNITION
ENGINE CONFIGURATION 4.2Litre, 6 CYLINDER I/L OHC
FUEL TANK CAPACITY 95 Litres
TRANSMISSION 5 SPEED MANUAL
SELECTABLE REAR OR ALL-WHEEL DRIVE
REFARENCE MASS 2280 kg
EQUIVALENT INERTIA 2270 kg
ROAD LOAD @ 80 kph 11.7kW

3.2 TEST RESULTS

COMPOSITE URBAN EMISSION DRIVE CYCLE
CLASS NA VEHICLE (GVM <4.5 Tonnes)
STANDARD SHOWROOM
CONDITION
12.52 L/100km
fOLLOWING INSTALLATION OF 11.14 L/100km
COMPOSITE URBAN EMISSION DRIVE CYCLE
CLASS NA VEHICLE (GVM <4.5 Tonnes)
OXIDES OF NITROGEN (NOx) 2.42
PARTICULATE MATTER (PM) 0.17
TOTAL HYDROCARBONS (THC) 0.22
CARBON MONOXIDE (CO) 0.64
CARBON DIOXIDE (CO2) 321.35

TABLE 3.2.2 A AVERAGE TAILPIPE EMISSION TEST RESULTS GRAMS/KM
STANDARD VEHICLE

COMPOSITE URBAN EMISSION DRIVE CYCLE
CLASS NA VEHICLE (GVM <4.5 Tonnes)
OXIDES OF NITROGEN (NOx) 2.10
PARTICULATE MATTER (PM) 0.14
TOTAL HYDROCARBONS (THC) 0.20
CARBON MONOXIDE (CO) 0.53
CARBON DIOXIDE (CO2) 286.15

TABLE 3.2.3: AVERAGE TAILPIPE EMISSION TEST RESULTS GRAMS/km
FITCH FUEL CATALYST INSTALLED

4. CONCLUSION

From the results detailed within section 3.2 of this report, it can be noted from tables 3.2.2. & 3.2.3, that following the installation of the “Fitch Fuel Catalyst”, there was a reduction in the Average Tailpipe Emissions of the gasses currently legislated against within vehicle type approval and certification tests undertaken throughout the developed world.

The major concern with compression ignition engine vehicles at present is finding a solution to the high levels of Oxides Of Nitrogen and Particulate Matter emitted by such vehicles. The installation of the “Fitch Fuel Catalyst” reduced Oxides Of Nitrogen by 13%, and Particulate Matter by 18%. There was also a reduction in the levels of Total Hydrocarbons (THC) 9%, Carbon Monoxide (CO) 17% and Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 11%.

Fuel efficiency was also enhanced following the installation of the “Fitch Fuel Catalyst”, primarily due to the reduction in the emitted levels of the “Greenhouse Gas” Carbon Dioxide (CO2). An 11% decrease in fuel consumption was achieved over the CUEDC test cycle with the “Fitch Fuel Catalyst” installed.

Prepared By:
Robyn A. Davies. IEng MIRTE MSOE LCGI.
For & Behalf Of:- VIPAC Engineers & Scientists.
Approved Research Organisation (ARO. 0125 ).
DOT.4009.

{ 1 comment }