I’ve given the Fuel Catalyst a pretty good test. From Townsville to Darwin. I’m really happy with it.
My vehicle is a 91 Toyota Coaster with a 3B engine. It is a Diesel motor with 260,000 on the clock.
Before having the Fitch fitted I was getting 6 ks per liter – 16.5 liters per 100ks. Now I seem to be getting 7.5 ks per liter – 13.3 liters per 100 ks. In my calculations that is 25% better. It seemed to improve as I went along.
Thanks again.
Helen Priest.
As you may recall I had an in-line Fitch Fuel Catalyst fitted to my 1996 VS Calais some time back. The result was very satisfying as you know I told “A Current Affair” when they came and saw me, just that.
I was so impressed with the gain in fuel economy consumption that I then had the Fitch drop-ins dropped into the fuel tank of my diesel motor home (4.3 litre motor).
We motor homers are always looking for ways to go a little further for the dollars we spend.
The results again were impressive. Not only with regard to extra kms per litre, but also increased power. The vehicle was already a good puller and to gain here was an added plus.
That characteristic diesel puff from the exhaust was also reduced.
Prior to drop-ins the 3.5 ton Mitsubishi was giving between 5 and 6 kms per litre. I was now getting in effect every fifth tank of fuel free, and due to the improved performance was not needing to drive the diesel as hard as previously (even though they are built for it).
I am telling all I can about the Fitch fuel torque and horsepower improver, and through you a number of my friends (including the new owners of my motor home, Tom and Pam) are enjoying a very good return on their investment in this product.
Keep up the good work.
Laurie Worth J.P.
I Hank Tummers, who has membership with C.M.C.A since the last three years (membership nr. Q 21064) and own a coaster motorhome, would like to inform that when I bought the coaster, I was very disappointing in the amount of fuel that I was using.
After talking to some people they gave me a telephone number of the Fitch Fuel Catalyst in Queensland.
Since that time, my fuel consumption went from 6.5kms per litre to 9.5kms per litre. And I saw improvement in performance of my vehicle. I couldn’t believe it!!
Therefore I would recommend this product to anyone who is interest in saving money!
Hamk Tummers
RV West Journal Report:
The Fuel catalyst test results. The Fitch Fuel Catalyst was tested and came through with flying colours.
When we last left Cranbrook residents Jim and Sylvia Alford, SED Technologies Inc, had given them a Fitch Fuel Catalyst to test out on their RV.
For those who didn’t read the last article the Fuel catalyst is a simple device designed to optimize fuel performance. It is suppose to increase your vehicle’s kilometers per litre of gas, give you greater horsepower and torque, lower emissions and reduce carbon build-up.
Well we at RV West, along with the Alfords, put those clams to the test in the Alfords 1982 19′ motorhome. We had instructor Spencer Moeller and the students at the College of the Rockies test the emissions before and after the Fitch Fuel Catalyst was installed and the Alfords took about a 400-kilometre test run. The results are below.
BEFORE INSTALLATION
Loaded (Gas pedal depressed)
RPM
| RPM |
Idle |
1,000 |
1,500 |
| Co |
4.50 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
| Hc |
240 |
200 |
150 |
| Co2 |
10.00 |
11.00 |
12.50 |
| O2 |
2.20 |
3.90 |
1.80 |
AFTER INSTALLATION AND ROAD TEST
Loaded
| RPM |
Idle |
1,000 |
1,500 |
| Co |
3.52 |
1.93 |
3.42 |
| Hc |
173 |
135 |
70 |
| Co2 |
8.58 |
10.10 |
11.50 |
| O2 |
4.95 |
4.46 |
1.55 |
When asked what these numbers mean, Moeller put his answer in plain English.
“It shows a more complete combustion & they’re utilizing more of the fuel’s energy,” said Moeller.
And go farther they did. Before the installation, the Alfords RV was getting 4.42 kilometers per liter. Afterwards, Jim recorded 5.39 kilometers per liter; a 19 percent increase in fuel efficiency. There was also a definite power increase with Jim talking about his experience on a local steep incline:
“I usually have to drop down into second gear and I lose five kilometers-per-hour on the hill, but now I can leave it in drive and I only lose two kilometers-per-hour,” he said.
RV West Magazine
July 2003
